Carnegie Mellon University v. Marvell: Marvell Loses Motion to Exclude Damage Expert Testimony That Included Price and Profit Margin on Chips Where Damage Expert Did Not Rely Upon Entire Market Value Rule
Promega Wins $50 Million Jury Verdict — and the Court Takes It Away Because Promega Did Not Show That Infringing Products Were Made or Sold in the United States or Imported into the United States
Challenge to Plaintiff’s Damage Expert’s Opinion on Reasonable Royalty Successful Where Expert Relied on Hypothetical Negotiation That Would Have Resulted in Financially Catastrophic Agreement for Defendants
Damage Expert Opinion Allowed Where Expert Properly Apportioned the Value Between the Patented Feature and the Unpatented Features of the Accused Products
Damage Award of $5 Million Upheld Where Plaintiff Submitted Expert Testimony of Running Royalty Rate and Jury Was Not Required to Adopt Either of the Parties Royalty Calculations