Motion to Exclude Damage Expert under Daubert Denied Where Expert Relied upon Incremental Profit and Cross-Examination Was Sufficient to Challenge Expert
Assignment Agreement That Failed to Specifically Address Right to Sue for Past Damages Held Insufficient on Summary Judgment; Summary Judgment Granted to Limit Damages to Period After Patent Was Acquired
$50 Million Jury Verdict Over Turned Where Plaintiff Based Damage Theory on Worldwide Sales of Accused Products But Only Established That “Some” of Worldwide Sales Were Infringing
Carnegie Mellon v. Marvell: Marvell Loses $1.17 Billion Jury Verdict and Jury Finds Marvell’s Infringement Willful After Court Precludes Marvell from Relying on Its Own Patents as a Defense
Court Denies Marvell’s Emergency Motion to Strike Carnegie Mellon’s Attempt to Include Noninfringing Sales of Chips That Are Never Used in the United States as Untimely and an Improper Attempt at Reconsideration
Brandywine v. Cisco: Motion to Dismiss Damage Claim Based on Inadequate Disclosures Denied But Plaintiff Ordered to Supplement With Information in Its Possession or Risk Preclusion