September 14, 2011

Twenty Percent Royalty Rate Appropriate Where Plaintiff Was Highly Unlikely to License Its Patent to Defendant, a Direct Competitor

August 31, 2011

Motion for Ongoing Royalty Denied Where Jury Awarded Lump Sum in Verdict

August 8, 2011

Court Orders Production of Sales Evaluation Files for Products Accused of Infringement

August 5, 2011

Failure to Mark with Patent Numbers Limits Pre-Suit Filing Damages

July 18, 2011

Damage Experts’ Opinions Excluded Where Experts Did Not Establish Link Between License and the Patent-In-Suit

July 1, 2011

Plaintiff’s Expert Precluded from Testifying on Entire Market Value Rule Where Basis for Consumer Demand Was Not Shown

June 14, 2011

Patent False Marking Claims Prove Largely To Be A Nuisance

JMM

Privacy Overview

We use cookies for site operations, enhanced functionality, analytics, and marketing purposes. You can review our Cookie Policy for more details.