May 8, 2024

Key Evidentiary Rulings in Acceleration Bay v. Activision

April 13, 2023

Masimo v. Apple: District Court Excludes Lost Profits Damage Theory for Failure to Disclose

October 17, 2022

District Court Permits Damage Expert to Testify Regarding Comparable Licenses That Contained “Built-In Apportionment” of Royalties

May 5, 2020

District Court Vacates $45 Million Damage Award But Holds That Plaintiff Did Not Waive Right to Damages Award Due to Invalid Damages Theory Put Forward at Trial

March 27, 2018

Ericsson v. TCL: District Court Tosses Out Damage Theory Based on Improper Use of Survey

February 7, 2017

District Court Excludes Damage Expert for Failure to Apportion But Gives Expert One More Opportunity to Supplement Report

December 13, 2016

District Court Orders Plaintiff to Supplement Damage Information Provided in Federal Rule 26 Initial Disclosures Where Plaintiff Failed to Compute an Actual Damage Number

September 20, 2016

District Court Excludes Damage Expert’s Opinion Based On Faulty Royalty Calculation

September 8, 2016

District Court Precludes Damage Expert from Using a Settlement Agreement to Derive a Reasonable Royalty Calculation Where Expert Employed a Likelihood of Liability Estimate Based Solely on a Study That Patent Holders Prevail Approximately 40 Percent

JMM

Privacy Overview

We use cookies for site operations, enhanced functionality, analytics, and marketing purposes. You can review our Cookie Policy for more details.