Imperium v. Apple: Seventy-Four Products Added Against Apple on Motion for Leave to Amend Infringement Contentions Even Though Trial Set for April 2013
WiFi “Sniffing” Ruled Not a Violation of the Wiretap Act Where Patent Holder Sought to Collect Information That Was Available over Public WiFi Networks
Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Denied Even Though Defendant Contended that Patent Infringement Claim Contradicted the Specification of the Patent-In-Suit
Apple v. Samsung: Court Denies Samsung’s Motion for an Adverse Jury Instruction Because Samsung Waited for “Months and Months” and Only Sought the Instruction During Trial