Motion to Strike Expert Testimony Granted to Preclude Expert’s “Logic Analysis” to Determine the Physical Structure of a Circuit but Expert Permitted to Opine That Logic of Accused Circuit Corresponds to Patent
Plaintiff Allowed to Amend Complaint to Include Willful Infringement Based on Allegation That Defendant Continued to Sell Infringing Products after Learning of Patent Through Service of Original Complaint
Adobe Moved to Disqualify Opposing Counsel Where Counsel Had Done Opinion Work and Had Never Sent a Letter Terminating the Relationship Before It Took Matter Adverse to Adobe
Inequitable Conduct Claim Dismissed on Summary Judgment Motion Where Conduct of Patent Prosecutor Was Disputed and Did Not Require a Finding of Intent to Deceive
Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena for Complainant’s CFO Denied by Administrative Law Judge Where CFO’s Deposition Was Relevant to Domestic Industry Requirement