February 10, 2016

Chestnut v. Apple: District Court Puts Plaintiff to the Test–Proceed on Limited Number of Claims or Continue Stay pending Inter Partes Review

February 8, 2016

District Court Grants Motion to Exclude Proceeding before PTAB during IPR But Allows Admissions and Arguments Made to PTAB to go before the Jury

January 21, 2016

District Court Declines to Stay Action Pending Inter Partes Review (“IPR”) Where Claim Construction Briefing Had Already Occurred

December 23, 2015

District Court Declines to Modify Claim Construction Based on PTAB Denial of IPR

November 23, 2015

District Court Lifts Stay Pending Inter Partes Review (“IPR”) after the USPTO Declined to Institute Review on Two of the Three Patents-In-Suit

November 11, 2015

District Court Administratively Terminates Motion to Dismiss Because of Pending Inter Partes Reviews (“IPRs”)

October 14, 2015

District Court Declines to Admit Denial of Petition for Inter Partes Review (“IPR”) into Evidence before Jury

October 12, 2015

District Court Denies Defendants’ Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review (“IPR”) Where Third Parties Filed IPRs and Defendants Would Not Be Subject to Estoppel Provisions

September 15, 2015

It Is Cold Out There: District Court Denies Joint Stipulation to Stay Case Pending Inter Partes Review — Twice

« Previous 1 2 3 4 … 10 Next »