District Court Determines No Personal Jurisdiction Exists Under Rules (4)(k)(1) and (4)(k)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Where Plaintiff Could Show Only a Single Infringing Unit Was Sold in the State and Defendant’s Website and Other Activities Were Not Directed at Residents of the State
District Court Vacates $45 Million Damage Award But Holds That Plaintiff Did Not Waive Right to Damages Award Due to Invalid Damages Theory Put Forward at Trial
Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Plaintiff’s Lost Profits Damage Expert Denied Even Though Plaintiff’s Expert’s Opinion Was Contradicted by Testimony from Plaintiff’s Corporate Designee
District Court Permits Ex Parte Communication with Former Employee and Co-Inventor of Plaintiff But Orders Defendants to Turn Over Certain Email Communications