Damage Award of $5 Million Upheld Where Plaintiff Submitted Expert Testimony of Running Royalty Rate and Jury Was Not Required to Adopt Either of the Parties Royalty Calculations
After Finding of Direct Infringement on Summary Judgment, Court Concludes that Defendant’s Infringement Was Not Willful But Denies Defenses of Laches and Equitable Estoppel
Defendant’s Motion for Leave to Amend Invalidity Contentions Denied Where Defendant Failed to Show Good Cause for Amendment Based on Court Declining to Construe Certain Claims